A system that only stores what enters it is an archive; a system that changes what enters it is something closer to a metabolism. Knowledge behaves the second way more often than most epistemologies admit. A citation is rarely repeated identically — it gets compressed, reframed, attached to a new argument, and returned to circulation altered by its passage through a different mind. Treating this as degradation, a falling-away from some original purity, misreads what is actually happening: transformation is the mechanism by which ideas stay alive rather than becoming inert deposits. ProteolyticTransmutation names this breakdown-and-rebuild cycle directly, borrowing the biochemical image of proteins cut apart and reassembled into different functional forms without losing their underlying material. A field that resists this metabolism — that insists every citation must preserve the original claim intact — tends toward brittleness, guarding a purity that was never really available to begin with, since even the first statement of an idea was already a transformation of something prior.
Barabási, A.-L. (2016) Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brand, S. (1994) How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built. New York: Viking.
Galloway, A.R. (2004) Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.