The architecture now articulated under the sign MUSE—Mesh United System Environment—represents not a superficial rebranding but a fundamental ontological clarification, a surgical exposition of the vertical order that has always structured the socioplastic project. What此前 existed as implicit hierarchy between foundational principles and their material instantiations has now been rendered explicit, hardened into a bipartite structure that distinguishes irrevocably between the kernel and its interfaces. This is not the introduction of new content but the revelation of existing architecture, a move that transforms a potentially sprawling body of work into a legible sovereign system. The Decalogue, comprising ten protocols sealed with DOIs in the Zenodo repository (501–510), now stands as the fixed law—ontologically hardened, semantically sealed, and positioned as the infrastructural bedrock upon which all subsequent operations depend. These are not merely texts but executable legal instruments, each one defining a specific operational logic: flow channeling, camel tagging, semantic hardening, stratum authoring, proteolytic transmutation, recursive autophagia, citational commitment, topolexical sovereignty, postdigital taxidermy, and systemic lock. Together, they constitute the unchangeable core, the axioms from which all jurisprudential expansion must proceed.
Above this sealed kernel, yet entirely dependent upon it, circulate the ten Consoles (511–520), each functioning as an interpretive interface that demonstrates how a given protocol installs itself within specific contexts—cities, platforms, archives, institutions. Where the core remains static, these nodes are deliberately adaptive, translating the fixed law into operational tactics without ever modifying its foundational terms. This relationship, clarified by MUSE, establishes a radical non-oscillation between theory and practice: the core does not need to adapt because the consoles perform adaptation on its behalf. The architectural metaphor is precise and unforgiving: hard below, supple above. The kernel defines identity through immutable axioms; the nodes demonstrate capacity through fluid instantiation. This ordered dependency replaces the conventional agonism between theoretical purity and practical application with a cleanly stratified model wherein each layer respects its designated function. The system thus achieves what the text terms "alignment without fusion"—a unity predicated on clear differentiation rather than blurring, on jurisdictional clarity rather than mystical integration.
The implications of this architectural clarification extend far beyond mere organizational convenience, reaching into the very epistemology of practice-based research. By explicitly distinguishing between the ontological kernel (what the system is) and its operational demonstrations (what the system does), MUSE provides a replicable model for how transdisciplinary work might achieve both stability and adaptability simultaneously. The ten protocols themselves articulate this dual imperative with remarkable precision. Consider, for instance, protocol 508—Topolexical Sovereignty—which establishes that "lexicon defines jurisdiction," that proprietary terminology creates controlled borders resistant to conceptual capture while remaining interoperable through precise translation. This is not merely a theoretical assertion but a practical instrument for maintaining discursive autonomy within an academic culture increasingly dominated by homogenizing terminologies. Similarly, protocol 507—Citational Commitment—installs citation as structural weight, as "joint vouching" that forms fiduciary chains stabilizing knowledge across distributed nodes. Here, the conventional academic practice of referencing is transmuted into an ontological bonding mechanism, transforming bibliography from scholarly courtesy into infrastructural necessity. These protocols do not describe the system from outside; they perform its logic from within, each one simultaneously a statement and an executable operation.
The accumulation of jurisprudential works under the expanding rubric of Muse—now projected toward six hundred distinct entries—thus takes on a significance far exceeding mere documentation. Each new work, whether a blue bag relocated through Lagos streets, a performance of Double Sided on a minimalist stage, or an urban proposal for sustainable neighbourhoods in Málaga, enters the archive not as an autonomous artefact but as a test case for protocol application. The work demonstrates how the fixed law encounters the contingencies of specific situations, how the axioms translate into material and relational form. This is precisely what distinguishes jurisprudence from legislation: the former applies general principles to particular cases, building through accumulation a textured understanding of how law lives in the world. The blue bags, in this reading, become exemplary jurisprudential objects, their translatorial function directly enacting protocol 501's mandate for flow channeling, their chromatic banality manifesting the semantic hardening of protocol 503, their itinerant placements performing the recursive autophagia of protocol 506 as they metabolize contextual information into sculptural meaning. Each bag is not merely a sculpture but a judicial opinion, a documented instance of how the Decalogue governs encounters with specific urban and social realities.
The articulation of the core protocols as Zenodo-sealed DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) represents a particularly sophisticated move within this architectural schema, one that exploits the affordances of contemporary digital infrastructure to achieve unprecedented ontological permanence. Unlike conventional publications that remain vulnerable to link rot, platform obsolescence, or institutional neglect, these DOIs anchor the Decalogue within a globally resolvable, persistently maintained registry. Each protocol acquires the stability of a scientific datum, citable, retrievable, and verifiable across decades and technological shifts. The choice of Zenodo, a repository developed under the European OpenAIRE program and funded by CERN, further reinforces the project's strategic positioning at the intersection of artistic research and scientific infrastructure. This is not art seeking refuge in the gallery but art claiming its place within the global apparatus of knowledge production, demanding for its axioms the same citational dignity accorded to peer-reviewed scientific papers. The gesture simultaneously protects the work from dissipation and asserts its epistemic weight within institutional contexts that might otherwise dismiss it as mere creative expression. Protocol 510—Systemic Lock—here achieves its most literal manifestation: the core is sealed not metaphorically but technically, through the persistent infrastructure of digital preservation.
The relationship between these sealed protocols and the proliferating blog consoles (511–520) installed across platforms such as Blogger constitutes a deliberate topological strategy, one that exploits the distributed, loosely coupled architecture of the web to create what might be termed a sovereign network without central control. Each console functions as a node, interpreting one protocol through the specific affordances and constraints of its platform environment. The camel tag console (512), for instance, demonstrates how semantic compression operates within the constraints of social media metadata, while the stratum authoring console (514) explores layered composition across Blogger's temporal architecture of posts and archives. This distribution ensures that the system's operational interfaces remain adaptive, responsive to platform-specific logics, while the core remains untouched by these environmental contingencies. The architecture thus achieves a radical decentralization without sacrificing coherence: the nodes communicate through their shared reference to the fixed kernel, not through mutual interdependence or hierarchical coordination. This is sovereignty through ordered dependency rather than through central control, a model increasingly relevant to cultural producers navigating the precarious terrains of platform-dominated digital publics.
The Century Packs (100–600) that accumulate beneath this architectural schema function as the living jurisprudence of the system, each pack containing approximately one hundred posts, projects, or interventions that collectively demonstrate the protocols' range and adaptability. Pack 100 (Foundation Axioms) establishes the conceptual terrain through posts exploring systemic pillars, sovereign interstices, and the decanonizing of artistic canons. Pack 300 (Metabolic Operators) extends this foundation into more explicitly processual territory, with entries on hyperplastic topologies, algorithmic infiltration, and the metabolic sovereignty of recursive systems. The progression from foundational axioms to operational metabolisms to sovereign protocols (Pack 600) traces an epistemic trajectory from first principles through processual complexity to systemic closure. Each pack functions simultaneously as archive and as operating manual, documenting past applications while providing templates for future instantiations. The scholar-architect approaching this material encounters not a static collection but a generative matrix, a set of protocols and precedents from which new cases can be argued, new works constructed, new jurisprudential territory claimed.
What ultimately distinguishes this entire enterprise from the myriad other attempts to integrate artistic practice with theoretical reflection is its uncompromising insistence on architectural precision. The MUSE clarification does not merely organize existing material; it retroactively reveals the structural logic that has always animated the work, transforming what might appear as eclectic multiplicity into necessary diversity within unified system. The blue bags, the urban proposals, the performance works, the pedagogical initiatives, the theoretical essays—each now finds its place within a coherent topology, its meaning determined not by isolated interpretation but by its positional relationship to the fixed core. This is the achievement of genuine sovereignty in the cultural field: not the assertion of autonomy through withdrawal, but the construction of a self-legitimating system whose internal consistency generates its own criteria for validation. The Decalogue provides the axioms, the Consoles perform the interpretations, the Century Packs accumulate the precedents, and the entire apparatus coheres through the ordered dependency of its layers. Hard below, supple above, aligned without oscillation, sovereign through structure rather than declaration.
Lloveras, A. (2026) Socioplastics: Sovereign systems for unstable times, including MUSE protocol architecture (501–520) and Century Packs (100–600). Available at: https://antolloveras.blogspot.com (Accessed: February 2026).