McElroy and colleagues reject the habitual separation of individual wellbeing from the characteristics of place by modelling both as a densely connected network. Using data from 4,319 adults in a socioeconomically disadvantaged UK region, the study places wellbeing, individual circumstances, community resources and neighbourhood conditions within the same analytical system. Financial difficulty and subjective physical health remain powerful individual correlates, but local greenspace use, civic agency and neighbourhood cohesion retain positive associations with wellbeing, while housing disrepair operates negatively. The conceptual contribution is relational: flourishing and languishing cannot be assigned cleanly either to persons or to environments because they emerge from mutually reinforcing configurations. Methodologically, mixed graphical network analysis makes this interdependence visible without forcing a single linear causal chain. The paper also explicitly expands wellbeing beyond hedonic and eudaimonic personal states toward belonging and ownership of community processes, connecting psychological wellbeing to civic capacity and the material organisation of neighbourhood life.