Look at what a syllabus places in week three and what it never mentions at all, and you have a more honest account of a discipline's boundaries than its official self-description usually offers. A syllabus authorises certain relations between ideas by teaching them together — this text alongside that one, this method following that one — while relations it never stages remain, for most students, simply unthinkable rather than actively rejected. Curriculum design is therefore an architecture of permitted adjacency long before it is a body of content, and the omissions carry as much authority as the inclusions. SymbolicEnclosure names the effect of this bounded architecture: a field enclosed by what its syllabi habitually teach together comes to feel, from inside, like the natural shape of the subject rather than one historically contingent selection among many that could have been made. Revising a syllabus is rarely just updating content; it is redrawing which relations a student will find it possible to imagine.
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Biesta, G. (2010) Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics and Democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Bruner, J.S. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cormier, D. (2008) 'Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum'. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5).