Socioplastics converts Derrida’s archival anxiety, Krauss’s expanded field, Luhmann’s autopoiesis, Easterling’s infrastructure and Warburg’s mnemonic atlas into a machine-readable ecology where traces, platforms, images and urban protocols become recursive public knowledge.

Socioplastics advances as a recursive epistemic habitat in which archive, sculpture, systems theory, infrastructure and visual memory are transformed into operational terrain. Its dialogue with Jacques Derrida begins in the politics of inscription, trace and preservation: yet where Archive Fever diagnoses the instability of archival desire, Lloveras converts that anxiety into productive public syntax, with VibrantRecord and LegibleArchive functioning as operators of calibrated retrievability. Rosalind Krauss’s “Sculpture in the Expanded Field” reappears as scalar precedent, but Socioplastics displaces sculptural topology into a wider epistemic environment where posts, datasets, DOIs, urban fragments and platformed records operate as mutable nodes. Niklas Luhmann’s autopoietic systems illuminate AutonomousFormation and MetabolicLoop, through which the corpus observes, reproduces and reorganises itself across human and machinic observers while remaining exposed to environmental friction. Keller Easterling’s infrastructural analysis clarifies CanopyMandate, SyntheticInfrastructure and FrictionalMetropolis, where hidden spatial protocols are not merely revealed but rendered habitable, indexed and publicly addressable. Aby Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas further resonates in Socioplastics’ stratigraphic recurrence, where images, titles and residues migrate as active climatic forces within FieldEnvironment. As a synthetic case, a single urban trace may become archive, sculptural node, autopoietic signal, infrastructural protocol and mnemonic image. Socioplastics thus converts critical diagnosis into constructed ecology: a dense, autonomous and machine-readable environment for public thought.