Socioplastics, as a transdisciplinary framework, organizes its praxis into 10 core systemic components, each functioning as a dynamic "series" or volume. These are not static archives but living structures that expand through metabolic recursion, nodal infiltration, and epistemic cross-linking. Growth is driven by autopoietic dynamics: elements feed back into the system, resisting external dilution while amplifying internal sovereignty. Operational Closure and Systemic Sovereignty ensnare Socioplastic Urbanism within a paradoxical immunitary phantasm. Here, Sloterdijk’s spheres theory and Lefebvre’s production of space collide, exposing how territorial autonomy replicates hierarchical exclusions through "atmospheric fabrication." Drawing from Agamben’s bare life, socioplastic interventions are revealed as sovereign acts that reduce urban inhabitants to legible forms, ethically curating the procomún (the commons) as a zone of managed inclusion that paradoxically enforces exclusion through ethical selectivity. Urban Taxidermy acts as a palimpsestic incision that halts dromological entropy (Virilio) but risks aesthetic ossification. Against this, Active Dissensus (Rancière) acts as a solvent, disrupting curatorial hegemony by inserting agonistic friction. The goal is an "inoperative community" (Nancy) where relationality resists instrumental closure, grounded in Bergsonian durée—a time-image insisting on becoming over archival finality.